Sense on Syria

by on October 5, 2016 in International affairs

Just to prove that this web site does not just engage in Guardian bashing all the time here is a link to an excellent article in the Guardian – by the excellent Mary Dejevsky – on the failure of the recent ceasefire in Syria to take hold.

She makes the needed point that the ceasefire deal might have reflected a will on both sides (the US and Russia) to strike a deal. But the warring parties on the ground, on both sides, may not have been fully signed up. The US and Russia may not have full control over their clients/proxies. A peace deal will require commitment from the actual warring parties as well as from other regional players as well. There may not be a will for this at the moment because both sides may still believe in the possibility of a military victory. Of course one could argue that if the US and/or Russia stopped arming each side that would make a difference. On this point the Russian side would naturally point to the legitimacy of their arms sales to an established government in contrast to covert supplies by the US to non-state actors. Nonetheless Dejevsky’s point that there is momentum on the ground for a fight is a good one.

Dejevsky is an excellent writer because she avoids the main trap into which Western journalists fall, that of writing from within the context of a pre-ordained narrative frame-work in which everything the West does is good and ‘right’ and everything the State Department says is 100% true. Dejevsky, in contrast, sticks to facts, and writes clear-headed, calm, analysis. It is less dramatic, much less ‘tribal’ (backing one side at the expense of objectivity just because you happen to belong to them), and exactly what is needed.

Add to Favorites Print article