I find this interesting because I have been reading recently in the mainstream press that the vaccine offers better protection than natural immunity. This has been presented as scientific truth. 
In (scientific) fact for many, natural immunity is a perfectly reasonable way to go. For young people (the exact age would depend on the vaccine, the study and the metrics) it is certainly safer to go with the possibility of acquiring the disease and getting natural immunity this way than taking some of the vaccines on offer. 
I would guess there is a collusion between the mainstream media and profit seeking pharma and “science” and government to promote vaccination over natural immunity. They coordinate to deliver a solution. That is, in Illich’s sense, a packaged and addiction creating (a vaccine needs to be repeated every 6-12 months) product which can be sold and ‘delivered’ to passive consumers. All of this a) is terribly profitable especially since the funding comes from compulsory taxation and b) creates more dependent ‘citizens’ who are then prepped for some other top-down solution to be ‘delivered’ to them. Such is our modern and dystopian world. We have already arrived.
I don’t think there is a conspiracy here. I think these people do this automatically.
- For example: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/17/previous-covid-infection-may-not-offer-long-term-protection-study-finds the vaccine offers a “really robust response”.
- https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40328123.html https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-risk-from-pfizer-jab-side-effect-than-covid-suggests-study