Well this journalist certainly doesn’t want to hear the point of view of the Trump camp. He does his level best to shut his interviewee down.
Of course – the comparisons with a) Hunter Biden’s easy ride for gun and tax evasion charges b) no action at all on the link between Biden junior’s payments and access to political influence despite overwhelming circumstantial evidence and c) the Democrats claiming the 2016 “election was stolen” – as Hilary Clinton certainly did – and did using obvious lies and fakes such as the “Steele Dossier” paid for, according to the NYT by the DNC and Clinton’s campaign,- are not permitted. I’ve seen this line a couple of times from the Times today; “I am asking you about Trump not Biden or Clinton”. They are trying to shut people down who want to ask questions about the political motivation behind these indictments. The point is if the law is being deployed selectively and that can (as it can) be established then you have already proven that this is a “weaponization” of the justice system. Which is why they have to shut it down.