As NATO declares eternal war some people won’t be crying. The following table was obtained from Google simply by typing e.g. ‘share price Lockheed Martin’. You then get a timeframe button and you can choose 6 months. I’m not copying the charts because it is easy to do this yourself. I think these are the top UK/US arms manufacturers.
Share Price over last six months (rounded)
I would guess that the problem for Boeing is that arms is only a part (39%) of its business and its civilian aircraft business is still suffering from the pandemic and technical issues with the 737 Max. Everyone else seems to be doing very well.
Imagine the profits which are being made by big pharma by expanding vaccination to even small children. And repeat doses. Despite the incredibly low mortality rate in young children.
This is a textbook case of Illich’s criticism of “right-wing” institutions. They want to make people dependent on repeat doses of their often useless products. The government (agencies) don’t mind – they are in bed with these people, and it isn’t their money anyway. The shareholders don’t care who they inject and who they scare. The best thing that can be said about Covid vaccines for children is that in most cases they cause little harm unlike for example ADHD drugs. In most cases because there is a small risk profile for Pfizer and adolescent boys.
ADHD drugging, mass over-use of anti-depressants, (I think in the US opioids) – and now pointless Covid vaccines. The media is usually silent or collusive. (The New York Times ran a piece the other day about the parents who have been traumatised by not being able to get their healthy three-year olds vaccinated; vaccine porn).
I haven’t posted to this site for a while. This is partly due to lack of time. It is also because I have decided to focus the posts I write solely on questions of how the media works (in the West). In fact I have set myself a rule; I cannot post anything which I can’t categorize as being ‘media comment‘. One reason for this re-focus of the site is that I misread Russian moves prior to their actions in Ukraine. With hindsight I think I was in denial. Anyway – it seems to me better to write about what I have a real interest in – how the media works, rather than just opine about geo-political developments. I don’t really have the time to do that with the depth necessary to write anything useful.
So – the grounds for this post is that I am promoting a web article by dissident UK journalist Craig Murray. I wish to hell that there were more journalists like Craig Murray. It would make a huge difference. Not this insane and short-term promotion of the current war on Russia.
I agree with virtually all of this article, accept perhaps I don’t know for sure whether Russia could ‘win’ on the ground in Ukraine. Unfortunately I also agree with Craig’s assessment that a negotiated peace currently does not interest the partisans on either side or those in power and so we can expect the killing to continue.
It continues to amaze me just how little interest Western political and media circles have shown in getting to the bottom of the question of where this virus, which upended the world (in fact much of the upending was due to misplaced government responses, but that is a different matter) came from. In the US the Democrats have blocked all Congressional enquiries. Extraordinary. As the MIT scientist interviewed by Al Jazeera says – there is unmistakably a cover-up.
Al Jazeera – doing balanced journalism – reports that there has been a slew of recent studies which claim to locate the origins in the Wet Market. (The Wuhan Wet Market seems to fall in and out of favour as the putative origin). What strikes me about this is that it is a fact (as reported e.g. by Colin Butler a Professor at Australian National University in Canberra and UN Contributor) that China has not supplied researchers with all the required data. Indeed, as the article reports, China has removed useful information about the genetic sequences of early cases from the Internet – and the actual Wuhan lab database was hidden back in September 2019. So – these researchers who are loudly proclaiming “Wuhan market” (and therefore it seems “not lab”) are doing so despite a deliberately controlled and restricted evidence base. This is hardly objective science. Indeed it is extraordinary. But the media is often (not in this case) using these studies to once again dismiss the lab-leak theory.